A simple PoW-PoS hybrid

A simple PoW-PoS hybrid

Are there already coins which use a proof-of-X construction where the mining is done by proof-of-work by the coin owners and the difficulty of the mining exercise depends on the amount of coins you possess? How do you call this construction and why isn't it the usual construction?

http://ift.tt/2hXpMVc

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bitfinex & Market Synergy To Offer Institutional Calibre Cryptocurrency Connectivity

Bitfinex & Market Synergy To Offer Institutional Calibre Cryptocurrency Connectivity Market Synergy GmbH , a Swiss-based organisation which offers institutional cryptocurrency connectivity and security for banks, brokers and hedge funds has been selected by  Bitfinex  to provide robust, high performance connectivity for institutional clients. Market Synergy has designed and built a bespoke network for Bitfinex, hosted in a Swiss data centre in the heart of Crypto Valley. In addition to providing outsourced connectivity and hosting services to Bitfinex, Market Synergy can also manage co-location services for Bitfinex’s institutional clients and offer a FIX feed and ISP link to the digital asset gateway which Bitfinex recently launched in collaboration with Connamara . Market Synergy is a separate company within the FXecosystem Group , which also comprises of FXecosystem and Bondecosystem, both of which are institutional market leaders in outsourced connectiv...
Read more

How a transaction proves its ownership of the its source, which can be one or multiple unspent output?

How a transaction proves its ownership of the its source, which can be one or multiple unspent output? I read the following from the book << Mastering Bitcoin >> "As you may notice, the transaction contains an empty scriptSig because we haven’t signed it yet. Without a signature, this transaction is meaningless, we haven’t yet proven that we own the address from which the unspent output is sourced." I am wondering how a signature can prove that this transaction owns the address from which the unspent output is sourced? https://ift.tt/2r4Ni7x
Read more

Mining block are not accepted if BIP related values changed to 0 or 1

Mining block are not accepted if BIP related values changed to 0 or 1 I am creating own alt from LiteCoin source. So I have changed hashGenesisBlock , hashMerkleRoot , nonce , timestamp etc.Things are working fine if i don't make BIP34Height , BIP65Height , BIP66Height & BIP34Hash value to 1 .While doing mining using cpuminer generated hash/blocks are not accepting and that's why blocks are not getting generated/added. If I change that BIP( BIP34Height , BIP65Height & BIP66Height and BIP34Hash) values(not default which is litecoin values), that generated hash/block should be accepted from cpu miner or any other third party mining binary. I've tried by setting value to 0 & 1 both but same result things are not working as expected .. Here is log URL generated from mining : https://gist.github.com/adneerav/591e61657292e6c6561a26b69dc78870 If I don't change that BIP values things are working fine.Generated blocks are accepted to add.Please check log which is ...
Read more