What is off-by one error in updating target? How is it fixed?

What is off-by one error in updating target? How is it fixed?

Can some one explain completely what off by one error is? how is it fixed?

https://ift.tt/2IKXRbi

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bitfinex & Market Synergy To Offer Institutional Calibre Cryptocurrency Connectivity

Bitfinex & Market Synergy To Offer Institutional Calibre Cryptocurrency Connectivity Market Synergy GmbH , a Swiss-based organisation which offers institutional cryptocurrency connectivity and security for banks, brokers and hedge funds has been selected by  Bitfinex  to provide robust, high performance connectivity for institutional clients. Market Synergy has designed and built a bespoke network for Bitfinex, hosted in a Swiss data centre in the heart of Crypto Valley. In addition to providing outsourced connectivity and hosting services to Bitfinex, Market Synergy can also manage co-location services for Bitfinex’s institutional clients and offer a FIX feed and ISP link to the digital asset gateway which Bitfinex recently launched in collaboration with Connamara . Market Synergy is a separate company within the FXecosystem Group , which also comprises of FXecosystem and Bondecosystem, both of which are institutional market leaders in outsourced connectiv...
Read more

How do 'Sphinx' invoice-less payments on the Lightning Network work?

How do 'Sphinx' invoice-less payments on the Lightning Network work? There was recently a WIP draft published to the lnd Github, for a 'Sphinx payment mode' for Lightning Network nodes. To quote Roasbeef from the Github PR : [this allows] the ability to send a payment to a destination without first needing to have an invoice Though this is a WIP, it can apparently be used on mainnet already, as long as all nodes involved are upgraded to include the new code. So how does this work? At a high level, what does the UX look like? At a low level, what differences are there in terms of completing the payment (passing HTLCs around), compared to a standard LN transaction? Whats going on under the hood? http://bit.ly/2FoFIgP
Read more

How a transaction proves its ownership of the its source, which can be one or multiple unspent output?

How a transaction proves its ownership of the its source, which can be one or multiple unspent output? I read the following from the book << Mastering Bitcoin >> "As you may notice, the transaction contains an empty scriptSig because we haven’t signed it yet. Without a signature, this transaction is meaningless, we haven’t yet proven that we own the address from which the unspent output is sourced." I am wondering how a signature can prove that this transaction owns the address from which the unspent output is sourced? https://ift.tt/2r4Ni7x
Read more